Publications and projects according to DDC
Publications
Publications and projects according to DDC 300: Social sciences
-
Nef, Susanne,
2020.
Intersectional transcultural research.
In:
Buch Release "Intersektionale Sozialforschung", Berlin, 16. Dezember 2020.
-
Nef, Susanne,
2020.
Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) als Schirm : die integrative Stärke der GTM.
In:
Wissensaustausch Grounded Theory Methodology, FHNW, Olten (Schweiz), 18. November 2020.
-
Gemperle, Michael,
2020.
.
In:
Sapiro, Gisèle, ed.,
Dictionnaire international Bourdieu.
Paris:
CNRS Éditions.
pp. 16-18.
-
Haunberger, Sigrid; Hadjar, Andreas,
2020.
Why are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? : a theory-driven analysis.
International Social Work.
65(1), pp. 17-34.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819884982
Projects
Projects according to DDC 300: Social sciences
-
RobotCare - User experience in development of service robots for elderly care
Objectives of the project: Establish a systematic dialogue between the technology developers and researchers and the elderly/healthcare institution stakeholders (including medical, care, and service personnel, management, patients, and their families) in both regions and develop a suitable international community ...
-
Accompanying Evaluation Model Station SOMOSA
-
DICLIS - Surveying the ZHAW Diversity Climate for students at the ZHAW
-
Using customer insights analysis for business growth in the plant-based meat and fish alternatives sector
Wild Foods GmbH is a Swiss start-up that uses an innovative manufacturing process to produce high-quality fish and meat alternatives from plants. The range currently includes a vegan salmon alternative made from carrots and vegan dried meat made from beetroot. Organic vegetables and vegetables declared as B-goods ...
-
Analysis and synthesis of policies for the digital transformation of a Swiss canton
The relevant strategic frameworks were analyzed to ensure the coherent management of digital transformation across organizational and federal borders. Using the steering levels (principles, fields of action, priorities, objectives) as a starting point, the frameworks were compared, and commonalities and gaps were ...